An independent side-by-side ethics comparison of Allbirds and Enviroscent across certifications, average sustainability score and product range.
89.8/100 avg ethics
6 products tracked
Certifications
82/100 avg ethics
1 products tracked
Certifications

Lightweight, breathable sneakers made from FSC-certified eucalyptus tree fiber and sugarcane-based 'SweetFoam' soles.

A high-performance running shoe made from sustainably sourced eucalyptus tree fibers and FSC-certified natural rubber. known for its extreme comfort and carbon-neutral production process.

A lightweight, breathable walking shoe made from FSC-certified eucalyptus tree fiber and a carbon-negative sugarcane midsole.

A performance running shoe made from eucalyptus tree fiber and sugarcane-based foam, boasting a carbon-neutral footprint.

A high-performance running shoe crafted from carbon-neutral eucalyptus tree fibers and sugarcane-based foam, balancing athletic utility with industry-leading sustainability.

A carbon-neutral running shoe made from eucalyptus tree fibers and sugarcane foam designed for everyday miles.

A non-toxic alternative to standard 'hanging trees,' using sustainably sourced wood pulp and essential oils rather than synthetic phthalates.
Allbirds scores higher on independent ethics scoring: Allbirds averages 89.8/100 vs Enviroscent at 82/100.
Allbirds appears with 5 verified certifications (B Corp, FSC Certified, Regenerative Organic Certified, Carbon Neutral, Vegan). Enviroscent appears with 3 (FSC Certified, Cruelty-Free, Vegan).
Yes. Both brands are scored by the same methodology — never paid placement. See our methodology page for the weighting.