Earth Rated vs Stasher
An independent side-by-side ethics comparison of Earth Rated and Stasher across certifications, average sustainability score and product range.
Earth Rated
85/100 avg ethics
4 products tracked
Certifications
Stasher
Higher score89.3/100 avg ethics
3 products tracked
Certifications
Top Earth Rated products

A B Corp certified solution for pet waste, these vegetable-based bags are fully compostable and designed for eco-conscious dog owners who want to reduce plastic waste.

A high-quality, plant-based alternative to traditional plastic waste bags, designed to break down in municipal composting facilities while providing superior leak-proofing.

High-quality, extra-thick waste bags from a certified B Corp focused on reducing environmental impact through recycled materials and community support.

Eco-friendly, ultra-thick disposal bags made from sustainable cornstarch. These are home-compostable and leak-proof for worry-free walks.
Top Stasher products

High-grade platinum silicone storage bags that eliminate the need for single-use plastics in food storage and cooking.

The Stasher Reusable Silicone Storage Bag is a plastic-free alternative designed for eco-conscious families seeking to eliminate single-use waste in 2026. As the best ethical food storage container for sous vide and meal prep, it features platinum food-grade silicone and a patented Pinch-Loc seal to keep food fresh without toxic leaching.

High-performance platinum silicone bags that replace thousands of single-use plastic baggies.
Frequently asked: Earth Rated vs Stasher
Which is more ethical, Earth Rated or Stasher?+
Stasher scores higher on independent ethics scoring: Earth Rated averages 85/100 vs Stasher at 89.3/100.
Which has more certifications?+
Earth Rated appears with 3 verified certifications (B Corp, FSC Certified, Cruelty-Free). Stasher appears with 6 (B Corp, Vegan, Cruelty-Free, B Corp Certified, Women Owned).
Are these scores independent?+
Yes. Both brands are scored by the same methodology — never paid placement. See our methodology page for the weighting.